Proof — Verse 1.43

तस्मादकृतकं शास्त्रं स्मृतिं च सनिबन्धनाम् ।
आश्रित्यारभ्यते शिष्टैः शब्दानामनुशासनम् ॥ ४३ ॥

Therefore it is by resting on the uncreated teaching, and on the tradition with its grounds, that the cultivated undertake the regulation of words.

Endorsed axioms (each cite is verbatim commentary)

Denials

Rejected readings (refuted by compiled theorems)

Lean module

/- Verse 1.43 — generated from data/contracts/1.43.json. DO NOT EDIT.
   Axiom cites are verbatim commentary quotations, validated by
   tests/test_contracts.py. -/
import VakyaVallari.Adequacy

namespace VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_43

open VakyaVallari

def akrtaka_sastra : Entity := ⟨"akṛtaka-śāstra", Sorta.absolute⟩
def smrti : Entity := ⟨"smṛti", Sorta.linguisticItem⟩
def grammar : Entity := ⟨"śabdānāmanuśāsana", Sorta.linguisticItem⟩

def contract : Contract :=
  { axioms := [ Claim.relation "asritya" (Node.ent grammar) (Node.ent akrtaka_sastra)
    , Claim.predication "nibandhana" smrti
    , Claim.relation "asritya" (Node.ent grammar) (Node.ent smrti) ]
  , denials := [ Claim.predication "arbitrary" smrti ]
  , reported := [] }

def accepted : Reading :=
  { claims := [ Claim.relation "asritya" (Node.ent grammar) (Node.ent akrtaka_sastra)
    , Claim.relation "asritya" (Node.ent grammar) (Node.ent smrti)
    , Claim.predication "nibandhana" smrti ] }

theorem accepted_adequate : contract.Adequate accepted := by decide

namespace Counterexamples

/- 'The cultivated decide the regulation of words by an arbitrary, self-justifying tradition without any transcendent grounding.'
   Why rejected: Misrepresents tradition as arbitrary and self-grounded, contradicting the commentary's explicit insistence that the smrti is not arbitrary but grounded in nibandhana and attachments to its source. -/
def arbitrary_tradition : Reading :=
  { claims := [ Claim.predication "arbitrary" smrti ] }
theorem arbitrary_tradition_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate arbitrary_tradition := by decide
#guard contract.contradicts arbitrary_tradition = true

/- 'Grammar is an arbitrary, conventional system maintained by tradition alone, with no connection to any uncreated or transcendent principle.'
   Why rejected: Simultaneously contradicts both axioms: (1) it denies grammar rests on uncreated teaching, and (2) it represents tradition as arbitrary, contradicting the commentary's insistence on nibandhana. It misses that both sources are necessary and neither is arbitrary. -/
def arbitrary_grammar_tradition_only : Reading :=
  { claims := [ Claim.predication "arbitrary" grammar
    , Claim.predication "arbitrary" smrti ] }
theorem arbitrary_grammar_tradition_only_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate arbitrary_grammar_tradition_only := by decide
#guard contract.contradicts arbitrary_grammar_tradition_only = true

end Counterexamples

end VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_43