नित्यत्वे कृतकत्वे वा तेषामादिर्न विद्यते ।
प्राणिनामिव सा चैषा व्यवस्थानित्यतोच्यते ॥ २८ ॥
Whether they are eternal or made, no beginning of them is found — as with living beings; and this arrangement is what is called eternality.
{"kind": "predication", "name": "anupalabdha_adi", "of": "sabda"}“on either horn, no adi, no beginning, is found”{"kind": "relation", "name": "iva", "from": "sabda", "to": "pranin"}“The analogy to praninam carries the argument”{"kind": "predication", "name": "nityata", "of": "vyavastha"}“what is eternal is not necessarily the item but the settled order in which items stand”{"kind": "predication", "name": "anadinidhana", "of": "vyavastha"}“the series of them has no first term, and their beginninglessness is perfectly compatible with each member being made”{"kind": "predication", "name": "adi", "of": "sabda"}“no adi, no beginning, is found”/- Verse 1.28 — generated from data/contracts/1.28.json. DO NOT EDIT.
Axiom cites are verbatim commentary quotations, validated by
tests/test_contracts.py. -/
import VakyaVallari.Adequacy
namespace VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_28
open VakyaVallari
def sabda : Entity := ⟨"śabda", Sorta.linguisticItem⟩
def adi : Entity := ⟨"ādi", Sorta.property⟩
def nityata : Entity := ⟨"nityatā", Sorta.property⟩
def krtakatva : Entity := ⟨"kṛtakatvā", Sorta.property⟩
def pranin : Entity := ⟨"prāṇin", Sorta.power⟩
def vyavastha : Entity := ⟨"vyavasthā", Sorta.manifestation⟩
def anadinidhana : Entity := ⟨"anādinidhanā", Sorta.property⟩
def contract : Contract :=
{ axioms := [ Claim.predication "anupalabdha_adi" sabda
, Claim.relation "iva" (Node.ent sabda) (Node.ent pranin)
, Claim.predication "nityata" vyavastha
, Claim.predication "anadinidhana" vyavastha ]
, denials := [ Claim.predication "adi" sabda ]
, reported := [] }
def accepted : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.predication "anupalabdha_adi" sabda
, Claim.relation "iva" (Node.ent sabda) (Node.ent pranin)
, Claim.predication "nityata" vyavastha ] }
theorem accepted_adequate : contract.Adequate accepted := by decide
namespace Counterexamples
/- 'Individual words possess eternality as an intrinsic metaphysical property.'
Why rejected: The verse's concessive opening ('whether they are eternal or made') explicitly declines any commitment to individual eternality. Its thesis is vyavastha-nityata (eternality of arrangement), not the eternality of words themselves. This reading commits to precisely what the verse brackets. -/
def individual_eternality : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.predication "nityata" sabda ] }
theorem individual_eternality_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate individual_eternality := by decide
#guard contract.licenses individual_eternality = false
/- 'Words, whether eternal or made, possess an identifiable beginning or origin point.'
Why rejected: Directly contradicts the core logical claim: on both horns of the disjunction (nitya or krtaka), no adi, no beginning, is found for them. This is the denial axis of the verse. -/
def words_have_origin : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.predication "adi" sabda ] }
theorem words_have_origin_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate words_have_origin := by decide
#guard contract.contradicts words_have_origin = true
end Counterexamples
end VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_28