प्रविभागे यथा कर्ता तया कार्ये प्रवर्तते ।
अविभागे तथा सैव कार्यत्वेनावतिष्ठते ॥ १२७ ॥
As, in the state of differentiation, the agent proceeds by means of it toward the deed, so, in non-differentiation, it is that very power which stands as the deed itself.
{"kind": "relation", "name": "sadhana_divided", "from": "sabda_sakti", "to": "karya"}“the karta proceeds toward his karya”{"kind": "identity", "a": "sabda_sakti", "b": "karya"}“stands as the deed”{"kind": "relation", "name": "gati", "from": "karta", "to": "karya"}“the karta proceeds toward his karya”{"kind": "relation", "name": "sadhana", "from": "sabda_sakti", "to": "karya"}“the word-power does not mediate the deed”/- Verse 1.127 — generated from data/contracts/1.127.json. DO NOT EDIT.
Axiom cites are verbatim commentary quotations, validated by
tests/test_contracts.py. -/
import VakyaVallari.Adequacy
namespace VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_127
open VakyaVallari
def karta : Entity := ⟨"kartā", Sorta.manifestation⟩
def karya : Entity := ⟨"kārya", Sorta.manifestation⟩
def sabda_sakti : Entity := ⟨"śabda-śakti", Sorta.power⟩
def contract : Contract :=
{ axioms := [ Claim.relation "sadhana_divided" (Node.ent sabda_sakti) (Node.ent karya)
, Claim.identity sabda_sakti karya
, Claim.relation "gati" (Node.ent karta) (Node.ent karya) ]
, denials := [ Claim.relation "sadhana" (Node.ent sabda_sakti) (Node.ent karya) ]
, reported := [] }
def accepted : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.identity sabda_sakti karya
, Claim.relation "gati" (Node.ent karta) (Node.ent karya) ] }
theorem accepted_adequate : contract.Adequate accepted := by decide
namespace Counterexamples
/- 'Word-power serves as a mediating instrument between agent and deed in both the divided and undivided states.'
Why rejected: Asserts that the sadhana (mediation) relation persists universally, but the verse teaches a shift: in differentiation it mediates, in non-differentiation it IS the deed (no mediation). The commentary explicitly denies this: 'the word-power does not mediate the deed; it is it.' -/
def persistent_mediation : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.relation "sadhana" (Node.ent sabda_sakti) (Node.ent karya) ] }
theorem persistent_mediation_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate persistent_mediation := by decide
#guard contract.contradicts persistent_mediation = true
/- 'Word-power is merely a useful property or tool that agents employ to accomplish their deeds.'
Why rejected: Treats śabda-śakti as a dependent property rather than a fundamental power. This inverts the ontology: the identity axiom (sabda-sakti = karya) reveals word-power as the ultimate substance of action itself, not a tool. The sort error (property vs power) exposes the misreading. -/
def sabda_sakti_property : Entity := ⟨"śabda-śakti", Sorta.property⟩
def demote_power : Reading :=
{ claims := [ Claim.predication "dependent_instrument" sabda_sakti_property ] }
theorem demote_power_inadequate : ¬ contract.Adequate demote_power := by decide
#guard contract.licenses demote_power = false
theorem demote_power_sort_error : sabda_sakti_property ≠ sabda_sakti := by decide
end Counterexamples
end VakyaVallari.Verses.V1_127